EnduringSense

“The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.” Plato

  • Daily Quote:

    "Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit."

    Mahatma Gandh

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 91 other followers

  • Subscribe

  • Advertisements

Posts Tagged ‘Cheney’

Arkansas Middle School Compares Bush and Cheney to Hitler and Manson

Posted by Steve Markowitz on June 3, 2011

The incredible story below is from the Atlanta Journal-Constitutional.  How despicable!  It is bad enough that Progressives call anyone who disagrees with their politics racists and bigots.  But to brainwash young minds with this trash takes the outrageous behavior to a new level.  Speaking of the Nazi’s, the Hitler Youth group leaders would be smiling.

Haven’t seen a report of this outrage in the mainstream media?  Not surprising.

Advertisements

Posted in Education, Radical Left | Tagged: , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

A Review of the Obama Presidency

Posted by Steve Markowitz on March 15, 2011

In June of 2009, long before the broader public viewed President Obama as an emperor without cloths, Blog reader Jim Mahoney understood the president and his radical agenda and wrote the piece below.  Jim’s words penned nearly two years ago accurately predicted where the Country was heading under President Obama.

The Presidency of George W. Bush had serious flaws, especially related to his fiscal policies.  However, under Barack Obama’s leadership, not one major policy area including financial, social and foreign policies has improved.  The presidency of Barack Obama will be viewed by history as a failure comparable to that of Jimmy Carter.

Who is Out of Touch? Jim Mahoney © 2009

I subscribe to several liberal and conservative blogs and newsgroups to stay informed about all sides of the issues.  The price I pay for this is that I received a lot of unsolicited emails.  Recently I received an email with the subject “Send Cheney Packing”.  It was from Jen O’Malley Dillon (why do liberals always seem to have three names?), the Executive Director of the Democratic National Committee.  It was, I’m sure, what she thought was a very clever message soliciting contributions to purchase a bus ticket to send Dick Cheyney back to Wyoming.  The message was illustrated with a cartoon graphic of Dick Cheney in a short yellow bus (nice bit of sensitivity there, Jen).  I eagerly read the message to discover what the vice president could have said that was deserving of banishment.  I’ll spare you the text of the entire message, but I will reprint selected passages from the email followed by my comments.  The message begins:

“After some of his recent interviews, former Vice President Cheney has shown that he clearly doesn’t know when to pack it in.  In just the last week, he’s gone on national television in an effort to tear down President Obama’s agenda – saying the President’s economic programs will be “devastating to our society” and that his foreign policy makes us seem “weak” to the rest of the world.”

Well, let’s review some of the Obama economic policies.  Obama, who blasted the Bush budget deficits during the campaign, has managed to quadruple that deficit in his first three months in office.  He has already spent more money than all 43 of the previous presidents combined, saddling future generations with a huge debt that we may never be able to repay.  If that isn’t devastating I don’t know what is.  In addition, Obama is already well on his way to nationalizing the financial and auto industries and he is moving swiftly to institute government run healthcare, unionization of companies without a secret ballot vote and granting citizenship to illegal aliens.  He is acting as quickly as possible to set these policies at the national level to virtually guarantee that we may never be able to unravel them.  I’m no expert, but none of this sound like a rational economic policy to me.

Obama has also been demonstrably amateurish on foreign policy matters as well.  At the G 20 Summit in Great Britain he literally bowed down to the king of Saudi Arabia and then figuratively bowed down to European leaders by apologizing for America’s past “arrogance”.  He traveled to the continent that gave the world Communism, Socialism and Fascism and felt that only America needed to apologize.  I would have liked for him to expand the apology club a little.  I’d like Great Britain to apologize for the way they starved, impoverished and tortured my ancestors in Ireland.  Italy could apologize for adopting Fascism in WWII, France could apologize for its cowardice in every war since the American Revolution and don’t even get me started on Germany.  However, in the world of Barack Obama, only the United States is ever at fault.  But wait, there’s more.  He continued the apology tour barely a week later at the Summit of the Americas.  Obama allowed himself to be used as propaganda prop by Hugo Chavez, who handed him an anti-American book that Obama displayed prominently for the television cameras.  Obama then sat silently as Nicaraguan president Daniel Ortega unleashed a tirade of anti-American rhetoric.  His only response was to express relief that he wasn’t being held responsible for things that happened before he was born.  His actions project a staggering level of weakness that has to have our enemies salivating.  But I suppose none of that matters to Jen as long as we have the coolest president evah!  Let’s continue with Jen’s insightful observations about Dick Cheney:

“I don’t know about you, but I think it’s time for him to stop sniping from the sidelines and let President Obama usher in the changes Americans demanded after eight years of Cheney’s disastrous policies.”

Sniping from the sidelines?  Oh, really.  I seem to remember a speech in which former vice president Al Gore was growling that George Bush “betrayed this country” by taking us into war on supposedly false information.  Furthermore, Gore made these comments in a deliberate attempt to discredit the President of the United States during a time of war.  Also, was it not Jimmy Carter and Gore’s former boss, Bill Clinton who broke with the long standing tradition of former presidents not criticizing their successors?   And who can forget this attack on the Bush administration from Hillary Clinton when she was a sitting senator laying the groundwork for her presidential campaign?  “I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you’re not patriotic, and we should stand up and say, “We are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration” (emphasis added)

I guess Jen didn’t get the memo or she would have known that Hillary herself gave the green light for dissent against any president, and Dick Cheney is merely following her lead.  At the time she made her statement, Hillary was praised by the media for taking a stand and “speaking truth to power”.  What is different now other than the political party of the president being criticized?  Rather than waste time on the obvious, let’s get back to Jen’s big closing argument:

“…While President Obama has been working to tackle America’s biggest issues, Cheney has been busy bashing the President in nationally-televised interviews – warning about a “vast expansion of the deficit” and agreeing with Sean Hannity that the President is “naive.” “

The fact that government spending and the deficit are going to explode under the Obama administration is openly acknowledged by both the White House and the Congressional Budget Office.  You want to talk naive?  Obama appears to believe that he can make the brutal dictators of the world listen to reason by the mere power of his personality.  In a shocking bit of irony, Obama announced a plan for unilateral American disarmament on the day after North Korea lobbed a missile into the Pacific Ocean.  Although it was deemed a failure by missile experts, the North Korean missile easily had the range to make Japan a potential target, and Los Angeles could potentially be in range after a few more months of testing.  Is it really wise for him to telegraph an intention to disarm at this time?  By any objective measure of their handling of the economy, foreign policy and national defense, the kindest thing we can say about the Obama administration is that it is amateur night.  Even after a cursory examination of the evidence, it doesn’t sound as if Mr. Cheney is incorrect as much as he is daring to speak out against the media-manufactured image that the American public is in universal agreement with everything Barack Obama says and does.

Let us for a moment accept the premise of the Democrat Committee message at face value.  If Mr. Cheyney’s remarks are as out of the mainstream as they would have us believe, why not just let him spout his views and destroy his own credibility as the American people make up their own minds?  Instead, any statements uttered by prominent conservatives like Cheney cause liberals to spring into action to simultaneously dismiss them as irrelevant while expending inordinate amounts of energy to discredit them.  If conservatism is really dead, why do liberals still fear it so?

The answer to this question was provided in a column by Michael Reagan in which he said, “There’s an old adage that explains that one does not shoot arrows at dead tigers.  If there is a fusillade of arrows flying in the direction of a tiger you can be sure of two things: the beast is very much alive and is seen as a dangerous threat to the people manning the bows.” Folks like Dick Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Sarah Palin and Bobby Jindal have a volley of arrows flying at them because liberals fear the ability they have to energize the conservative voters in America.  If Sarah Palin is indeed as inconsequential as liberals would have us believe, why are they still viciously attacking her seven months after the election?  Have you thought about John Kerry for even a passing moment since the day after the 2004 election?

The media not only attack the voices of conservatism, they also presume to decide who our spokesmen should be.  Tune in to any liberal cable news network and you’ll see a panel discussion of “experts” telling the Republicans what they need to do to be successful.  Their formula for success usually requires that conservatives abandon their core principles.  Does it strike anyone else as strange that conservatives should accept advice from liberals on how they can be more successful?  What’s next; the manager of the New York Mets giving his suggestions for the Phillies’ player roster?

As Barack Obama and his willing accomplices in congress attempt to push through their socialist programs at breakneck speed, we owe Dick Cheney our thanks for speaking up and demonstrating the backbone that is sadly lacking in the Republican members of congress.  Obama needs his poll numbers to remain high if he hopes to implement his agenda and Dick Cheney is pointing out the disconnect between the public’s perception of Obama personally and the dismal reality of our economy, foreign policy and national security.  The administration is well aware that Cheney’s message is being heard by both the conservative base and a growing throng of Obama voters who are experiencing buyer’s remorse.  The more they attack conservatives for speaking out, the more you will know that message is gaining traction.

Posted in President Obama | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

John F. Kennedy Would be Thrown Out of Today’s Democrat Party

Posted by Steve Markowitz on May 30, 2010

John Kennedy is considered an icon of the modern Democrat Party by many.  This is a romantic view of Kennedy, rather than an understanding of his political philosophies.

While much publicity by the media has focused on fringe groups in the Republican Party, it is the Democrat Party that has actually been hijacked by radicals.  A proof statement for this conclusion is the way President Kennedy viewed one of our founding fathers, Thomas Jefferson.  During a White House dinner in for his cabinet and others on his team, Kennedy said: “This is perhaps the assembly of the most intelligence ever to gather at one time in the White House with the exception of when Thomas Jefferson dined alone.”

Kennedy was educated on the writings of Jefferson, unlike today’s Ivy League intellects who only discus the fact that Jefferson owned slaves.  Let us review a few of Jefferson’s conclusions that made him so insightful:

When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe.”

“The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.”

“It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes: a principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.”

“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”

“My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.”

“No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”

“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”

“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property – until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.’

Should any one of these quotes be made today by S. Palin, D. Chaney, R. Paul or other Republican, the press would brand them as radical.  Should a politician quote them in mass, their compassion would be questioned, as well as their intellect.  It would be interesting to hear how the spin makers on the Left would interpret Kennedy’s view of Jefferson.  It’s ironic that such views today would certainly get Kennedy bounced from the party for which he became an icon.

Posted in Democrats, John Kennedy, Radical Left, Thomas Jefferson | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments »